Author Topic: SOLD For Sale 1971 Chevrolet Corvette Roadster 454 SOLD (Read 37194 times)

Camo · « **Reply #20 on:** March 26, 2014, 06:15:03 PM »

Ring them and ask them

Camo · « **Reply #21 on:** March 26, 2014, 07:04:04 PM »

Apparently car ads are done one month before the mag comes out & Just Cars put the ads on their website, not the seller. I believe there are some cars that have been sold for over a year or two that are still listed on the Just Cars site

69VETTE · « **Reply #22 on:** March 26, 2014, 07:38:40 PM »

Thanks Cam, i was interested that's all. . Currently looking at a 69 tri power in Vic advertised for a tad over $50k

Jethro · « **Reply #23 on:** March 26, 2014, 07:54:59 PM »

Quote from: 69VETTE on March 26, 2014, 07:38:40 PM

Thanks Cam, i was interested that's all. . Currently looking at a 69 tri power in Vic advertised for a tad over $50k

Hang on a minute wasn't it you that stated "When a C3 is not Enough! - Try A C4"

MY081 · « **Reply #24 on:** March 26, 2014, 08:25:45 PM »

Now come on fellas everyone knows its got to be C3. I recon before C3 not enough technolagy , after C3 tomuch technolagy . With the C3 they had it just wright !!!!!!!

bfit · « **Reply #25 on:** March 26, 2014, 10:32:03 PM »

The gospel by MY081
Amen
Bfit

anychevy · « **Reply #26 on:** March 27, 2014, 11:25:15 AM »

Quote from: MY081 on March 26, 2014, 08:25:45 PM

Now come on fellas everyone knows its got to be C3. I recon before C3 not enough technolagy , after C3 tomuch technolagy . With the C3 they had it just wright !!!!!!!

Really ?
There's not a lot of difference in technology from 65 to 82 (except wider wheels, EGR and "missfire injection")

MY081 · « **Reply #27 on:** March 27, 2014, 01:28:31 PM »

O yea i forgot plastic rear spring, thiner and lighter glass, larger half shafts, alloy diff carrier, larger luggage area, cornering light, cruise control, better seats.Just off the top of my head .

anychevy · « **Reply #28 on:** March 27, 2014, 01:45:50 PM »

OK but hardly "leaps and bounds" in engineering, basically same car, different body, with low compression and HP

bfit · « **Reply #29 on:** March 27, 2014, 01:50:02 PM »

IF you can't have a C3 then you could settle for a C2.

And there was major techo injections.
Like disc brakes and BB engine in 65
BFit

bfit · « **Reply #30 on:** March 27, 2014, 02:05:03 PM »

Quote from: anychevy on March 27, 2014, 01:45:50 PM

OK but hardly "leaps and bounds" in engineering, basically same car, different body

lower compression yes that allowed for the owner to fit his own blower or turbo
the early 70s were the times when hotrodders lead the way,
So GM worked with the goverment and the custom industry to present a product that would suit both the hot rodding fan and fit in with governmental pressures.

it also promoted employment in the custom industry.
thats why GM was way ahead of ford and mopar
Bfit

69VETTE · « **Reply #31 on:** March 27, 2014, 03:11:44 PM »

Quote from: anychevy on March 27, 2014, 11:25:15 AM

Really ?

There's not a lot of difference in technology from 65 to 82 (except wider wheels, EGR and "missfire injection")

Sorry, but had to put my 10 cents worth. . that's like saying that there's no difference between an Fj Holden and a Vk commodore . . lol

bfit · « **Reply #32 on:** March 27, 2014, 03:32:29 PM »

FJ Holden or a VK chev ( Vk they are principal a chevy car )
the FJ has charisma nostalgic appeal and fitted with a 350 and 4 speed
it will scare the shirt of most people.
and the pants of some girls.
Oh then there is EH or HR ohhhh with a Big block Muncie and 9" rear, 9 inches.
NOW we are talking about real hotrods. 10 second street cars

I can't say that about a VK, all dolled up with dressy wheels and no muffler

BFit

anychevy · « **Reply #33 on:** March 27, 2014, 03:37:58 PM »

Quote from: 69VETTE on March 27, 2014, 03:11:44 PM

that's like saying that there's no difference between an Fj Holden and a Vk commodore .

65-82 shared the same chassis (dimensions) same brakes, same steering, same suspension, same engine blocks, gearboxes
(BW then Muncie, then BW again) same diff (till 1980)
So, really, that's your comparison ?

69VETTE · « **Reply #34 on:** March 27, 2014, 03:39:00 PM »

Bfit, you are way too funny buddy. Yes very true, but not practical for daily drivers. You have to admit that you can't beat technology.

Try driving an Fj or an Eh with a 350 Chev that does 10s on the quarter daily, or even beta from Sydney to Melbourne . lol

69VETTE · « **Reply #35 on:** March 27, 2014, 03:42:23 PM »

All good anychev, I know that a lot of the parts were carried over. Hey my C4 shares generally the same chassis with the C3, with some minor mods to accommodate the body above. Corvettes were renown for doing that...

anychevy · « **Reply #36 on:** March 27, 2014, 03:44:43 PM »

Quote from: 69VETTE on March 27, 2014, 03:42:23 PM

All good anychev, I know that a lot of the parts were carried over. Hey my C4 shares generally the same chassis with the C3, with some minor mods to accommodate the body above. Corvettes were renown for doing that...

"See the USA in your Chevrolet" should have been "If it aint F-cked, don't fix it"

Camo · « **Reply #37 on:** March 27, 2014, 03:48:35 PM »

Practical daily driver??????? Get a Toyota or the like for that. We're talking head turning muscle here. Bragging rights

bfit · « **Reply #38 on:** March 27, 2014, 04:04:55 PM »

Quote from: 69VETTE on March 27, 2014, 03:39:00 PM

Bfit, you are way too funny buddy. Yes very true, but not practical for daily drivers. You have to admit that you can't beat technology.

Try driving an Fj or an Eh with a 350 Chev that does 10s on the quarter daily, or even beta from Sydney to Melbourne . lol

Mate the HR in that post is a very brief description of my car.
owned 67 to 85
it had a SB in 69 and BB in 70.
drove it to work every day and track every time I had the chance.

It went 127 at Castlereagh ( that MPH in the early 70s )

Bfit

bfit · « **Reply #39 on:** March 27, 2014, 04:08:26 PM »

Quote from: anychevy on March 27, 2014, 03:44:43 PM

"see the USA in your Chevrolet" should have been "if it aint F-cked, don't fix it"

if you have been told it would work the do it and make it work
if its bolted down. then it can be modified
BFit
be careful if the cutting touch come out to play

and we are not talking trailer queens here cars built to drive