In respect to your concerns about power output .... Without wanting to be too controversial... what is important to you, horsepower or torque?
I have a 87 Convertible and a 94 Convertible ... the 87 puts out about 240 hp and 330 ft/lb of torque and the 94 puts out 300hp and 330 ft/lbs of torque...interesting huh....
the important part is when then produce those figures...
I got the 87 dyna'ed and to my surprise .... it turned up about 160 rwhp....as you would expect from an instrument which measures output via the rear wheels....but GM measures from the flywheel( and hence the 240hp).... but the plot thickens....because GM doesnt take into account accessories hanging off the engine.
Numbers... numbers.... numbers.... they are unimportant.... because what is important is what happens at the lights!
BOTH cars go 0-60mph in about 6 secs!! even though there is a 60 hp difference.
BECAUSE the thing which gets you mobile from a standing position is TORQUE..... which is the ability of your engine to TWIST around the rear wheels thru the drive shaft, gearbox and diff( which are both geared)....
In the 87 that torque is max'ed in the 3000-4000 rpm range... whilst the max hp comes on line about 5200-5500 range....
So I ask the question... to more knowledgable forum members....
which is more useable Torque or Horsepower?
and where?
at the traffic lights... where 95% of us drive?
or the drag strip ... where 5% of us drive?
cYa
daniel42au
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~daniel42au/