Author Topic: court case (Read 103879 times)

StephenSLR · « **Reply #100 on:** May 05, 2017, 05:16:14 PM »

Quote from: Bfit on May 05, 2017, 05:08:51 PM

Who pays out when a police chase goes all wrong?

I remember back in the 80's, a guy I knew from school stole and smashed a car, the insurance co. kept writing him letters to cough up for damages and they eventually gave up. He had no job, etc. a lost cause.

s

Vettech · « **Reply #101 on:** May 05, 2017, 07:12:17 PM »

Yes - the easy way is to declare yourself bankrupt, could be for as little as 12 months, Ive only arms length experience, but seems a way to get out of your responsibilities or at least to get out of the grip of creditors. Not sure it is a good thing.

Vettech · « **Reply #102 on:** May 05, 2017, 07:37:15 PM »

Your wrong Bfit. You actually insure yourself against hurting others.
Think about it!
The only way "they" can quantify and controll it - is by attatching it to a "registered vehicle"
That way no matter who drives it - there is coverage.

Saves the litergation that was against both insurance companies and drivers.

With CTP the focus became insurance companies, flush with money, whilst Joe Drive may be a hick from Wollongong with nothing - just bad luck!

Big win for drivers untill insurance companies realised that the Golden Goose trough was starting to cut into gross profits.

AND SO ! The rules, regs, inclusions, disclusions, Post Code white washing started.

GOD Help the motorist because the Insurance Company wont.

bfit · « **Reply #103 on:** May 05, 2017, 08:16:44 PM »

I don't agree , if you have a licence then you would have insurance .
One insurance for all your cars ,
It would work ,Bfit

Lefty · « **Reply #104 on:** May 05, 2017, 10:06:19 PM »

Bfit, I agree.
You can't drive more than one car at a time.
If every licensed driver had insurance, every car being driven by a licensed driver would be insured.
Then the risk would be insured.
The commercial oportunity for insurers would be reduced, but I think premiums would increase, as currently there are more cars than drivers.
I don't think things will change.
Lefty

Vettech · « **Reply #105 on:** May 05, 2017, 10:26:57 PM »

Exactly - at my home we currently have six vehicles, but two drivers.

But your idea is quiet feasible, in fact could be workable, but to be fair - it shoud be one size fits all, after all I've driven in just about every post code in NSW.

The fact that I've not injured anyone - Oh ummm (if you discount lolly pop men, SydHarb Bridge toll collector, noxious window washer at lights) those
are of course fair game. So my rate would be the same if dr

Sry lot sorry lost power.

Lefty · « **Reply #106 on:** May 06, 2017, 05:34:47 PM »

Wow, that killed the thread!
Lefty

bootlegger · « **Reply #107 on:** May 26, 2017, 11:41:26 PM »

Its finally over. Now i can get my arse back in a vette. Thank fxxk for that.
Sorry to torture you guys with this over the last couple of years. Its three years in july since i had the accident.

StephenSLR · « **Reply #108 on:** May 27, 2017, 07:40:45 AM »

Quote from: bootlegger on May 26, 2017, 11:41:26 PM

Its finally over. Now i can get my arse back in a vette.

More info?

Have you now got a vette or did they give you a lump sum to go away?

s

metalhead · « **Reply #109 on:** May 27, 2017, 07:55:52 AM »

Good news!

gtc · « **Reply #110 on:** May 27, 2017, 02:54:13 PM »

Great to know that dogged persistence against the odds has paid off.

bootlegger · « **Reply #111 on:** May 27, 2017, 10:16:17 PM »

Ive got one hand tied behind my back. I have the wreck and i can do something about it. Im happy.
Thats pretty much all i can probably say.

Jethro · « **Reply #112 on:** May 29, 2017, 07:48:33 AM »

bootlegger · « **Reply #113 on:** June 29, 2017, 08:35:30 AM »

Well you woukd thinj my thread on this topjc would be over. Well a sherrif turned up and served a summons on me.
The guy I had the accident with wants to sue me.
Now i start all over again.
I thought when hjs i surance fi ally settled with me all this crap was almost over.

StephenSLR · « **Reply #114 on:** June 29, 2017, 08:59:03 AM »

Quote from: bootlegger on June 29, 2017, 08:35:30 AM

The guy I had the accident with wants to sue me.

lol.

Are you saying that because you won, his insurance co. is now hounding him to pay and he wants you to pay for his error?

Fat chance, if his insurance co. has found him at fault, I doubt the law will see it any differently.

s

gtc · « **Reply #115 on:** June 29, 2017, 10:45:06 AM »

Quote from: bootlegger on June 29, 2017, 08:35:30 AM

The guy I had the accident with wants to sue me.

Good grief! What's in it financially for him? He wants to try to recover his excess?

Makes no sense to me.

Vettech · « **Reply #116 on:** June 29, 2017, 01:33:14 PM »

Some people are easily led by sharp lawers.

bootlegger · « **Reply #117 on:** June 29, 2017, 09:48:26 PM »

He wants the money for his injuries and my insurer is refusing to oay. Its complicated but his solicitor is pushing this and thinks they can get it out of me.

gtc · « **Reply #118 on:** June 29, 2017, 10:05:13 PM »

Before political correctness became the fashion, I'd have said that you must have killed a Chinaman in a previous life.

bootlegger · « **Reply #119 on:** June 29, 2017, 10:28:27 PM »

Im kinda feeling like the chinaman atm im afraid.